<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is a good pixel for a digital camera?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cherry555.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=14036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cherry555.com/?p=14036</link>
	<description>come to talk with me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 19:38:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Need opinion on Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX9K, or recommendations for a Ultra Compact Digital Camera? &#124; Multisens</title>
		<link>http://www.cherry555.com/?p=14036&#038;cpage=1#comment-111551</link>
		<dc:creator>Need opinion on Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX9K, or recommendations for a Ultra Compact Digital Camera? &#124; Multisens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cherry555.com/?p=14036#comment-111551</guid>
		<description>[...] What is a good pixel for a digital camera? &#124; Cherry555 - Ha Ha Ha! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What is a good pixel for a digital camera? | Cherry555 &#8211; Ha Ha Ha! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is a good pixel for a digital camera? &#124; Cherry555 - Ha Ha Ha! Digital Sales</title>
		<link>http://www.cherry555.com/?p=14036&#038;cpage=1#comment-110697</link>
		<dc:creator>What is a good pixel for a digital camera? &#124; Cherry555 - Ha Ha Ha! Digital Sales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 03:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cherry555.com/?p=14036#comment-110697</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post:  What is a good pixel for a digital camera? &#124; Cherry555 - Ha Ha Ha! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post:  What is a good pixel for a digital camera? | Cherry555 &#8211; Ha Ha Ha! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is a good pixel for a digital camera? &#124; Cherry555 - Ha Ha Ha! &#124; Nikon Digital Camera</title>
		<link>http://www.cherry555.com/?p=14036&#038;cpage=1#comment-110685</link>
		<dc:creator>What is a good pixel for a digital camera? &#124; Cherry555 - Ha Ha Ha! &#124; Nikon Digital Camera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 03:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cherry555.com/?p=14036#comment-110685</guid>
		<description>[...] the original post: What is a good pixel for a digital camera? &#124; Cherry555 - Ha Ha Ha!    Categories: Uncategorized Tags: digital-camera, lenses-memory, provides-online       Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original post: What is a good pixel for a digital camera? | Cherry555 &#8211; Ha Ha Ha!    Categories: Uncategorized Tags: digital-camera, lenses-memory, provides-online       Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheCat</title>
		<link>http://www.cherry555.com/?p=14036&#038;cpage=1#comment-110655</link>
		<dc:creator>TheCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cherry555.com/?p=14036#comment-110655</guid>
		<description>Any 8 megapixels cameras from Canon, Nikon, Sony are good for general purpose use.  You can take a look at Canon A570 IS, A720 IS, SD850 IS or SD870 IS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any 8 megapixels cameras from Canon, Nikon, Sony are good for general purpose use.  You can take a look at Canon A570 IS, A720 IS, SD850 IS or SD870 IS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amt</title>
		<link>http://www.cherry555.com/?p=14036&#038;cpage=1#comment-110656</link>
		<dc:creator>amt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cherry555.com/?p=14036#comment-110656</guid>
		<description>Kodak makes a 5 megipixal that is really nice, but there 6 megapixal  sucks and they&#039;re both about the same price. Under $100 dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kodak makes a 5 megipixal that is really nice, but there 6 megapixal  sucks and they&#8217;re both about the same price. Under $100 dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the_prankster</title>
		<link>http://www.cherry555.com/?p=14036&#038;cpage=1#comment-110657</link>
		<dc:creator>the_prankster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cherry555.com/?p=14036#comment-110657</guid>
		<description>Check out the nikon coolpic camers, there are about 20 different ones ranging in price from about $150 to $500. And that right from their web site, so you may find them cheaper somewhere else. Nikon has also been making great cameras for pro and home use for a long time and not a new company that makes crap.

Unless your going to blow the pictures up bigger than 8x10 or use them for print (like magazines) a 4 or 5 mega pixel camera is fine. Now 6 or 7 megapixels camers are very common, but I think brand matters more file size. Pentax also makes good cameras
The more mega pixels your pictures are, the bigger the file so you can&#039;t fit as many on your memory card.
Also you may want to buy a camera that use the same memory cards as the camers you already have, and not all brands use the same memory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the nikon coolpic camers, there are about 20 different ones ranging in price from about $150 to $500. And that right from their web site, so you may find them cheaper somewhere else. Nikon has also been making great cameras for pro and home use for a long time and not a new company that makes crap.</p>
<p>Unless your going to blow the pictures up bigger than 8&#215;10 or use them for print (like magazines) a 4 or 5 mega pixel camera is fine. Now 6 or 7 megapixels camers are very common, but I think brand matters more file size. Pentax also makes good cameras<br />
The more mega pixels your pictures are, the bigger the file so you can&#8217;t fit as many on your memory card.<br />
Also you may want to buy a camera that use the same memory cards as the camers you already have, and not all brands use the same memory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vicseo</title>
		<link>http://www.cherry555.com/?p=14036&#038;cpage=1#comment-110658</link>
		<dc:creator>vicseo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cherry555.com/?p=14036#comment-110658</guid>
		<description>I agree with AMT&#039;s response since Consumer Reports states that the minimal megapixel requirement for a digital camera should be 5 megapixels.  And Kodak makes terrific affordable consumer digital cameras.

Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with AMT&#8217;s response since Consumer Reports states that the minimal megapixel requirement for a digital camera should be 5 megapixels.  And Kodak makes terrific affordable consumer digital cameras.</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
